Monthly Archives: October 2008

Picked up a spare ticket to the ‘Googleworld’ debate at the the Institute of Contemporary Arts yesterday evening. Bill Thompson chaired a pleasantly ‘warm’ chat between New York Times columnist Randall Stross and Independent columnist Andrew Keen.

Initially I wasn’t sure what to expect, billed as a look back over the past ten years of Google and forward to whatever might come next, it wasn’t as technically oriented as I’d hoped it’d be. It more focused on social and philanthropical interest – as a well as being a bit of a sell for both their new books.

I would have liked the opportunity to open up discussion to Semantic technologies, perhaps to pose the question, What are Google’s intentions? – if they even have any – of introducing any Semantic Web technologies to their platform. It’s something I was recently asked about after writing my last post, but it wasn’t really the right crowd.

In other news, Semantic start-up Twine goes public today. Founder Nova Spivack, posted some interesting stats yesterday about user engagement on the site over the last eight months during it’s semi-public, semi-beta phase.

It seems their users queue up some lengthy sessions on the site, longer even, he now predicts, than Delicious and MySpace.

It’s been hard not to notice the influx of tech blog posts over the past week or so covering all things Semantic Web. I’ve not had a decent chance to talk about the Semantic Web since I wrote my thesis last year, so I thought I’d take this as a good opportunity to do so and collect some of the best of those links in the process.

It’s staggering how much the Semantic idea has grown since I wrote my dissertation. In it I discussed mainly the social, technical and theoretical concepts of the Semantic Web – when I wrote it there was little else around to write about. There were no public start-ups or beta platforms – the community was small and extended little outside a designated group at the W3C and a handful of tech bloggers – their efforts too, were mostly spent on translating Tim Berners-Lee’s very technical, comparatively abstract, web dream across to the mainstream reader.

At that point the W3C were rapidly beginning to develop technologies like SPARQL and OWL, while others were under varied debate, such as RDF and Microformats. Not having a background in hard computer sciences, my interest was more in exploring the ubiquity, connectivity, of a Semantic Web, investigating what forces we would need to drive the paradigm – how our ideas of the Web were already changing with coming to grips with terms like (the then brand-new) ‘Web 2.0′ and embracing the Social Web phenomenon.

Nova Spivack is a leading voice, CEO of Radar Networks, founder of Semantic start-up Twine – an information storage and knowledge sharing service. He writes frequently at his Minding the Planet blog, full of optimism and colourful metaphor. He recently gave a talk at the Bonnier GRID ’08 conference in Stockholm – basically ‘the TED conference of Scandinavia’, about what he terms the future of the Web, ‘the Semantic Web and the Global Brain‘. Whilst worrying me by using many of the buzzing memes and science fiction references that I think actually harm those trying to invest in his optimism and adopt the Semantic idea – an all-knowing, understanding, artificially intelligent Web just sounds too good – it’s exciting how immediate he predicts the true impact of the Semantic Web impending.

Then it’s even more so to read popular ‘mainstream’ – or at least the more general – tech blogs giving more and more coverage to Semantic web, that the technology and abstract concepts are becoming commonplace and frequently in normal interest.

ReadWriteWeb, ever popular for polls and predictions favour Semantic technologies in various recent top ten-style looks into future web trends (and more here), but too, see the oncoming breakthrough as more immediate. Richard MacManus puts Semantic apps at number one on his hit-list of Web Predictions for 2008.

But while predictions continue to be made, the true killer-app remains allusive. Some do extremely well though. Freebase went public around the end of 2007, essentially a semantic Wikipedia, hasn’t gained the popularity I though it would’ve by now. True Knowledge natural language search is still in beta, though the platform I’ve tested so far is as impressive as their promotional video.

But then kinda out of the blue for me came two Yahoo! developments. SearchMonkey, not exclusively a Semantic Web app, is a search engine that promotes semantic data standards by making use of Microformats and embedded RDF as searchable metadata – definitely read the FAQ – and at the recent Web 3.0 Conference and Expo, announced the consumer release of Yahoo! Open Strategy (Y!OS), ‘blowin’ the doors wide open’ to the ‘open source, hacker attitude’ – basically, ‘rewiring’ Yahoo! to make all data service-wide openly available to developers and consumers alike, granting the opportunity for complete data portability – with the intent to extend even further in the future.

I concluded my thesis in suggesting a new drive would be necessary for consumers Web-wide to understand and willingly adopt the Semantic Web change. At that point the Web Science Research Initiative (WSRI) had just been launched, a joint venture between MIT and the University of Southampton to teach the literal academic science of the web – it was unclear whether this would be enough. Molly Holzschlag wrote a recent article at A List Apart, believing the ‘Ivory tower’ perception of the W3C to be discouraging to everyone independent of the organisation – that they’ve no real outreach. I agree, but think efforts like the newly founded World Wide Web Foundation are a direct result of their awareness of that, but they will fulfil their principle objective and speed the technological advancement faster than she may expect – I hope they do, at least.

For even more reading (and listening) material, subscribe to the Nodalities blog and podcasts. There’s a good interview with David Provost I recommend, discussing many of the things I’ve spoken about here, but also his recently published report on the Semantic Web industry as a whole.

It’s called, ‘On the cusp’. :)

It would seem the time has come. Paul Betlem, Senior Director of Engineering at Adobe, ‘confirmed’ earlier this week that Adobe are developing a Flash Player for the iPhone. It’s left the Flash community buzzing since the announcement was made at Flash on the Beach on Tuesday.

As a rumour, it’s been bounced around the Web for a while now (1, 2, 3), and Serge Jespers implores it’s nothing new. Perhaps it’s simply the next logical progression in the growth of the iPhone, or an inevitability in attempting to cure Steve Jobs’ Goldilocks syndrome.

His is a stance is one I can completely understand, I agree with the quote Mike Downey finds from Shantanu Narayan, Adobe CEO, in his belief that Flash is synonymous with the Internet. Poor support in the restrictions of Flash Lite could spoil the (otherwise, almost faultless) iPhone experience, or otherwise not be worth the effort that would be involved in it’s integration.

If this does come to fruition, I doubt it’ll be an upgrade for the current second generation iPhone anytime soon, it would certainly be too CPU intensive for it’s predecessor.

Sarah Perez at ReadWriteWeb though, asks a different question – Do We Care?

Looking at the comments and the poll results, apparently we do. Personally, I think it could offer almost boundless opportunity for current Flash developers.

Diggnation this week covered a story of rags-to-riches, posting the iTunes App Store as virtual gold mine for indie developers. Steve Demeter, developer of $5 iPhone game Trism, announced he made $250,000 in profit in just two months. The immediacy and simplicity in getting your application visibility on the app store means any project, like the effort from Demeter’s four-man crew, can contend an equal playing field – an ‘exciting new landscape’ as opposed to today’s overcrowded world of dot-coms, as the article puts forward.

Keep goin’ straight until night and then boy, you’re on your own.